On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 19:20, Carroll Grigsby wrote: > On Friday 24 October 2003 06:12 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 16:31, J.C. Woods wrote: > > > Sheesh, what next? Can we get an explanation of this phenomenon based on > > > Heisenberg's principle of uncertainty. After all, when dealing with > > > charged particles, you wouldn't want to omit any kind of explanation > > > based on quantum mechanics, would you? And, while we our at it, how > > > about the simple application of Planck's constant? It is a thorough > > > understanding we seek, yes? > > > > Lol.. > > > > > Hey LX, did you have any notion that your *simple* heads up on a > > > condition that could affect wireless communications would go so far? You > > > should have known, you have been here a long time, my friend. Well, I am > > > locked and loaded so let those particles come.... > > > > > > drjung > > > > I had no idea, my brother. It was originally a newsflash, not an exam > > essay. > > > > LX > > Let's cut to the chase. Should I wear my tinfoil hat or not? > -- cmg
You need passive shielding to stop the cosmic rays from causing DNA and cellular damage, so the hat should be lead, about three feet thick or so. Actually I need to run the numbers for lead against a 1 GeV particle running 87% the speed of light to get the exact thickness. Three feet seems like a good start. This same hat would help against a neutron bomb detonation, as long as you were in a concrete bunker. LX -- 같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같� Linux Mandrake 9.1 Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk *Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN* 같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
