Nice sugestions. Patches are welcome... s
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:36 +1000, Tim Thomson wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm liking the way things are going with RAW processing recently, I > think I might be about to make a full switch back from digikam. > > Just a couple of issues I've noticed, Pentax's .pef and .dng > extensions aren't in the IsRaw function so it won't shell out to > ufraw. (src/Imaging/ImageFile.cs line 218). I'm guessing there are > probably a few other ufraw supported RAW filetypes missing? > > Also, I think raw.Uri should be escaped when shelling out to ufraw so > that if a picture name has special characters, or someone opts to not > copy files when importing the call to ufraw will still work. > (extensions/DevelopInUFraw/DevelopInUFRaw.cs, line 35 perhaps?) > > The PEF RAW thumbnails are not displayed in the main browser, though > the DNG files are. From a quick look at the source it looks like this > is handled by the gnome libs, so I guess once I upgrade gnome it might > start working? It's interesting that they work fine in nautilus > though... > > It'd be nice to have f-spot not block when calling ufraw with this > extension, so you could still look at your other photos while > developing to compare, but I guess that would be pretty tricky > currently. > > Cheers, > > Tim. > _______________________________________________ > F-spot-list mailing list > F-spot-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list > _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list F-spot-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list