it's always better to attach patches to bug entries. to the list, if the patch is not applied i nthe next few days, it's lost forever...
i'm pushing this one right now... s On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 08:52 +1000, Tim Thomson wrote: > I just discovered svn diff, lots easier than diff -u. > > The attached diff simply adds Pentax RAW file extensions to the list > in the IsRaw function. > > I'm had a slow time compiling and installing the DevelopInUFraw > extension. Will have another go tonight. Hopefully have another small > diff by tomorrow. > > Are these ok posted to the list, or should I open bug reports for tiny > things like this? > > Cheers, > > Tim. > > > > On 10/23/07, Stephane Delcroix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nice sugestions. Patches are welcome... > > > > s > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:36 +1000, Tim Thomson wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I'm liking the way things are going with RAW processing recently, I > > > think I might be about to make a full switch back from digikam. > > > > > > Just a couple of issues I've noticed, Pentax's .pef and .dng > > > extensions aren't in the IsRaw function so it won't shell out to > > > ufraw. (src/Imaging/ImageFile.cs line 218). I'm guessing there are > > > probably a few other ufraw supported RAW filetypes missing? > > > > > > Also, I think raw.Uri should be escaped when shelling out to ufraw so > > > that if a picture name has special characters, or someone opts to not > > > copy files when importing the call to ufraw will still work. > > > (extensions/DevelopInUFraw/DevelopInUFRaw.cs, line 35 perhaps?) > > > > > > The PEF RAW thumbnails are not displayed in the main browser, though > > > the DNG files are. From a quick look at the source it looks like this > > > is handled by the gnome libs, so I guess once I upgrade gnome it might > > > start working? It's interesting that they work fine in nautilus > > > though... > > > > > > It'd be nice to have f-spot not block when calling ufraw with this > > > extension, so you could still look at your other photos while > > > developing to compare, but I guess that would be pretty tricky > > > currently. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Tim. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > F-spot-list mailing list > > > F-spot-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list F-spot-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list