On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Joe Groff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sympathize with your desire to Huffman-code common source patterns.
> But I think it's a really bad idea to start introducing sub-word-level
> syntax. The whitespace-delimited word is the atomic level of data in
> most Factor code, and breaking that rule should only be considered in
> exceptionally special circumstances; it'll confuse new users who have
> to learn "whitespace separates everything, except in method stack
> effects, typed tuple slots, and all the libraries following their bad
> example." It'll also make parsing and writing tools for dealing with
> Factor code (editor support, etc.) more complex.
I agree. I'd like to find a syntax for multi-method stack effects which
doesn't involve sub-word tokenization.
>
>
> I do agree with you that putting quotation marks around the tuple
> names is whacked.
Yup. They're no longer a part of the extended tuple syntax I'm working on.
Slava
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
