Kobi Lurie <[email protected]> wrote: > this is a forth feature, that factor departed from. > what do u think? Is it true that factor is becoming less simple as time > passes? or perhaps it's just shaping up a face of its own.
I'd agree with the latter -- it's a face of Factor's own. As a Forth user and fan, I'm glad Factor has gone beyond the primitives Forth offers and has well proven. The return stack worked well for Forth, but it isn't really simple; rather, it's primitive. Factor has long since discovered more powerful, high-level, and equally simple approaches to the same thing. Obviously, we don't have the last word yet... But we're working on it. > CU, kobi -Wm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
