I think you'd want virtual sequences as well, so getrow wouldn't necessary
copy data. Doing the API right would involve walking through various
numerical programming examples. We'd love any contributions you'd want to
make!
Thanks,
John.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Leonard P <leonard14...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Doug Coleman <doug.cole...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The style could be better, but we're lacking a bunch of words I'd want
>> for working with matrices efficiently. We'd need real n-dimensional arrays
>> like numpy has to do it properly, which is what I started in arrays.shaped.
>> Also remove-nth seems to be backwards from what I needed.
>>
>> Doug
>>
>
> Maybe a 2-d matrix protocol that doesn't care about the underlying
> representation would be a step in that direction.
>
> 3-d and n-d matrix protocols could also be defined.
>
> Generics would be getrow, getcol, getelement, getminor, getcofactor,
> determinant
>
> But maybe that's a little to Java-esque.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
