On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Doug Coleman <doug.cole...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The style could be better, but we're lacking a bunch of words I'd want for
> working with matrices efficiently. We'd need real n-dimensional arrays like
> numpy has to do it properly, which is what I started in arrays.shaped. Also
> remove-nth seems to be backwards from what I needed.
>
> Doug
>

Maybe a 2-d matrix protocol that doesn't care about the underlying
representation would be a step in that direction.

3-d and n-d matrix protocols could also be defined.

Generics would be getrow, getcol, getelement, getminor, getcofactor,
determinant

But maybe that's a little to Java-esque.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to