Interesting. Both versions work with my clang. ergmac:factor erg$ [master*] clang --version Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.4.0 Thread model: posix
So if the fix is correct, then we are all good. Doug On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jon Harper <jon.harpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well that's GCC 4.7.2 <https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/> September 20, 2012 > Gcc did fix this in GCC 4.7.3 <https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/> April 11, > 2013 > > Also, clang does not error on the implicit this, but crashes hard earlier > than gcc :) > > $ clang --version > Debian clang version 3.0-6.2 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM 3.0) > Target: i386-pc-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > > $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ make > make `./build-support/factor.sh make-target` > [...snip...] > 1. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:124:57: current parser token ';' > 2. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:1:1: parsing namespace 'factor' > 3. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:123:68: parsing function body 'sweep' > 4. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:123:68: in compound statement ('{}') > clang: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
