Are we using too-bleeding-edge C++ features?
Is the suggestion maybe we scale down to some subset compilers have had working
for 3-4 years?
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Jon Harper <jon.harpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well that's GCC 4.7.2 September 20, 2012
> Gcc did fix this in GCC 4.7.3 April 11, 2013
>
> Also, clang does not error on the implicit this, but crashes hard earlier
> than gcc :)
>
> $ clang --version
> Debian clang version 3.0-6.2 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM 3.0)
> Target: i386-pc-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
>
> $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
> make `./build-support/factor.sh make-target`
> [...snip...]
> 1. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:124:57: current parser token ';'
> 2. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:1:1: parsing namespace 'factor'
> 3. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:123:68: parsing function body 'sweep'
> 4. vm/free_list_allocator.hpp:123:68: in compound statement ('{}')
> clang: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
