On Mar 21, 2005, at 1:27 PM, crukstrom wrote:
> Now if we only had some way of determining, while not awake to/in
> Brahmin consciousness, whether another is awake to/in Brahmin
> consciousness. So many people on this list at one time thought MMY
> was awake and now they see him as a crook and a swindler. It's all
> so hilarious, isn't it?
It would be a relatively straight foreword procedure to verify Brahmi
chetana.
If they are in Brahman consciousness, then they can embody nama-rupa,
name-and-form, since they have overthrown duality. All we need is a
actual Sanskrit text or recorded recitation of Badarayana's sutras. All
they will need to do is utter the Sanskrit phrase or place their
awareness on it for them to embody this vidya ("cognize" the text from
it's source).
Then they can give a commentary which refutes their darshana of Unity
against the Samkhya (CC) darshana and the Bhagavata/Panchavrata View
(GC) just as Badarayana did and Shankara comments on (i.e. Adhyaya 2).
It would be nice to hear their explanation of Superimposition, Adhyasa,
since that is what Badarayana begins with.
Then it would be easy to compare their commentary to Shankara's, since
he derives a monist, Unity View, from Badarayana (while others got a
dvaita, or dualist View from it).
Since they would be presenting their darshana, their POV from the
perspective of the *Fruit* (Phala, the actual result of being in
Brahman consciousness), it might be worthwhile to emphasize the last
adhyaya, Phala.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
