--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Ron wrote: > > > Response: > > > > I will ask my Guru to comment, as I have been saying, I am not > > enlightened. I can only > > provide some intellectual response. Such as, the vedas is not what > > is cognized, it was > > relative things cognizesd- vedic math is relative, so it jyotish, > > and scripture. when all > > relative is gone, then ONE is, it is not persona, it only IS. > > > Ron, is the reason you mentioned 'cognizing the vedas' because of the > rumor spread by TB's (probably purushoids) that Mahesh 'cognized the > Vedas'? This is one of many self-perpetuated myths the org puts forth > to help justify devotion/investment despite waning interest. >
I never heard Maharishi say he had cognized the Vedas, nor did I hear anyone say this about Maharishi. Wasn't his translation of, and commentary on the Bhagavad Gita enough!?? Next you'll be telling us he wrote the encyclopedia brittanica...:-)
