--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lurk, I don't get what you and a few others are trying to do--wreck the place? There's already a quota on posts, which most people supported, and now there's you and a few others calling for Rick to be content cop as well. Did he agree to this, or did all this nonsense start when this Bronte character came in here, scolding people she doesn't know, and attempting to rearrange the furniture in a house where she, like everyone else, is a guest? I don't want any regulation on content, and my guess is most others don't either. These constant calls to tar and feather the flamers are really > childish, BTW. Just ignore the posts you don't like, or the posters you don't. Try it, it works. Give me the good old (argumentative) days over the phony crap that's been going on here lately any day.
Lurk: Okay Sal, obviously your POV is going to win the day. I was just going by the consensus that was arrived at a few weeks ago. No problem if no one but me is concerned about it. I thought the dialog has been pretty good lately, but I'm not going to argue with the market. If we lose some folks, well that's the way it is. God forbid we enforce the guidelines which have been on the books from day one. "Wouldn't be prudent. Not at this juncture"