--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Off, you amaze me! What makes you think I'm anti-science?
Because, correct me if I am wrong Angela, but you along with a bunch of others here on FFL, do not believe the 200+ peer-reviewed published studies in respected journals, are credible. This is anti- science, since the ONLY way humans have to test things to any level of reliability is through research published in respected peer- reviewed scientific journals. Maybe, I was wrong about you and you do believe in science, and therefore the 200+ peer-reviewed published studies that show how effective TM is in many areas. There is no other way. It is peer-reviewed studies in respected scientific journals, or is it personal opinion BS. OffWorld > off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 1:13 AM, off_world_beings wrote: > > > > > A million studies would not convince then about TM, yet it only > takes > > > about 40-50 to change my mind on TM. This is the absolute truth > for > > > me and totally proves their anti-science religious agenda to > ignore > > > science for their own pathetic opinions. > > > > > > What would it take for legitimate scientists to take TM/TMSP > seriously?>> > > They are already. > Five major universities conducting studies on TM as we speak, and $20 > million (and rising) from NIH given to MUM for research based on > robust studies. This fact alone makes you cringe so crooked Vaj it is > hard to watch. You have nothing remotely of comparable strength to > back up your weak anti-science stance. > > The poor anti-science folks like Turq, Steven, boo-lives, newmorning, > Angela, Sal, Peter etc. ... are grasping at straws as they sink below > the waves of the progress of science. > > OffWorld > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com >
