--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Advocate" simply means you speak for her on the points you did make. You said, "If I were her..." I did not say or imply that you share her point of view. But I do not want to waste any more posts on this. Hamlet can be interpreted in a gazillion appropriate ways. I want to know why among all those possible interpretations, mine is a "gross misreading," according to Judy. That is a direct quote. Let he defend that adequately. So far she has not supported that point of view in any way at all.
One more time: I've supported my charge that your interpretation is based on a gross misreading (not just an interpretation I disagree with, but a misreading, an error in understanding the phrasing of the text), in detail, twice: once in a post I made last night, and previously when the subject first came up, in a post I know you saw because you replied to it. The post I made last night is #158676. The earlier post is #152978. I followed up that post with another, #153010, responding to your copout reply to #152978. All three of those posts are available on the Web site, so you have no excuse for not looking them up. You wanted this little "chat," Angela, after first declaring you didn't have time for it. So get busy if you want to retain any credibility.
