--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Behalf Of authfriend > > , which he based upon his understanding of what Maharishi > > told him. > > You don't really imagine MMY wouldn't have read it > before it went to press, do you? > > I was there when Domash read it to MMY.
OK, so my initial statement stands: What Domash says in the essay is what MMY wanted folks to understand about the origins of the technique. Domash didn't just base it on his understanding of what MMY told him; he *confirmed* that it was what MMY wanted to have said. Whether Domash or Purusha or Mother Divine or you or Vaj or I believes the account approved by MMY is irrelevant to the issue of what the story is according to MMY. I'm mystified by why so many people get confused about the difference between "This is what MMY says" and "What MMY says is true."