--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <sandiego108@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > The main point is in the headline and the paragraph highlighted > in > > red, > > > below. > > > > > Even more succinctly in these few words,"...offering ourselves to > > the Totality of Brahm...". In other words, transcend our illusory > > individual nature. The rest is an intro lecture for the few > > fortunate souls that may stumble across this with open hearts and > > minds. If this is what it takes to continue to make the TM > technique > > available in the world, what is there to take issue with? > > > > BECAUSE IT FUCKING DOESN'T WORK, THAT'S WHY. > > How many MORE years of cult-run TMO do you want?
zero We've had 30 > years...would ANOTHER 30 years make you happy? I don't get the question... > > The failure of the TMO since the success -- the INCREDIBLE success -- > of the 1970s is the story of: IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT. > yeah...but the 70's are long gone, and if the only org to keep this technique alive is the wacky inefficient one, well that's what we got, and better than nothing, imo.
