--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Talk all you want about the hypocrisy of the TMO, > > because I agree with you there is plenty of that, > but > > listing the names of the innocent is absolute > > bullshit. > > > Pete, > How this guy could turn so many posters against him > with a point that > the movement heads are hypocritical is amazing! I > totally second your > point. > > Lets say it was an abuse of power from an authority > figure. Why hurt > the victim? Does this guy really miss this simple > point?
I think this guy native tongue is not English and he's from a third world country so his thinking is very different. I don't think he gets what we're talking about and why everybody is so upset with him. > It is funny to remember when we were students how > many faculty > including Domash the president, had student body > GFs. Lets make a > quick check, philosophy, art, music, physics, > political science, > University President, Dean of Students...it was a > perk of the low > paying job I guess. I heard about a few of them. I too thought it was rather odd that these 45 year old guys had these 20-something girlfriends that were students. At any other college you'd be fired immediately for an ethics violation. > Now to the name poster. Please acknowledge that you > understand the > point everyone has been making. You may have plenty > to contribute and > we all learn by posting. But being stubborn about > this without > understanding the feedback you are getting does not > bode well for the > relevance of your POV here. No one is trying to > curtail your freedom > of speech. But you can learn something about being > fair on a public > forum if you are willing. I think I'm going to make a list of all the women I had the hots over while going to MIU. Perhaps a list of who I didn't sleep with. Wait a second, that's easy. Every single woman there! > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- nadarrombus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > the way to talk about the sex lives of people > who > > > claim to have a > > > superior knowledge and practice of conducting > > > themselves sexually, ie. > > > claiming purusha, or brahmachari yet commonly > known > > > to have had sex > > > partners is exactly this way. > > > > You are a hopeless idiot. It is important to talk > > about this issue, but you don't start listing > names of > > the people the alleged perp had sex with. What the > > hell does that do? Its just pure slander. What is > so > > difficult to understand about that? > > > > > > > you are sounding like > > > a zealous > > > terrorist. your tone suggests you would protect > the > > > reputation of tm > > > leaders with violence to promote your beliefs. > > > > You completely miss my point. English must be your > > second language because you completely and totally > > miss the point I'm making with your recent post > and > > this one of mine from several years ago. I am not > > protecting the reputation of the TM leaders. I am > > protecting the reputation of these woman that you > > treat like a terrorist, not giving a shit about > the > > effect this has on them and they are the innocent > > victims here. Do you understand this? > > > > > > > you > > > believe you are > > > more right and special like they are cause they > are > > > a superior human > > > or have a better purpose than others. you ignore > the > > > way of our free > > > society and attempt to introduce > totalitarianism. > > > our individual > > > rights protect us from weak minded fools like > you. > > > > More rant from your erroneous assumptions. > > > > > > > it is ok for john, > > > bevan and nader ram to be duplicitous in your > mind > > > as they are the > > > state before the commune of heaven on earth > > > establishes itself. you > > > continue to use a threatening tone towards the > > > people interested in > > > truth in this forum. there is no slander except > your > > > continued > > > aggression to free and truth loving people in > your > > > stupid claims that > > > they are not moral enough to have their own > > > information and opinions. > > > we have the right to discuss freely our ideas > and > > > opinions despite the > > > terror tactics you continue to employee. no > > > discussion on a forum such > > > as this can have any legal implications > whatsoever > > > as it is an open > > > media undefined as fact or fiction, not intended > to > > > provide or deride > > > information toward anyone or any group and > contains > > > no contractual > > > agreements regarding statements in any > > > way........... > > > > Pal, you are arguing with yourself, because this > is > > not even remotely my position. I really don't > think > > you get it at all. Here it is again: DO NOT POST > THE > > NAMES OF PEOPLE THAT YOU THINK HAVE HAD SEX WITH > JOHN, > > BEVAN OR WHOMEVER BECAUSE THAT IS SLANDER. YOU DO > NOT > > HAVE THE LEGAL PRIVILEGE NOR THE MORAL RIGHT TO > POST > > NAMES. THIS IS HERSEY WRITTEN AS FACT. > > > > Talk all you want about the hypocrisy of the TMO, > > because I agree with you there is plenty of that, > but > > listing the names of the innocent is absolute > > bullshit. > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!' > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > === message truncated === ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
