--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > You
> > are trying to set up the "rules" of the dis-
> > cussion in such a way that the other person
> > has to agree to something that he doesn't 
> > believe in order to participate in the dis-
> > cussion.
> >
> > It's just so unnecessary. Why can't you believe
> > what you believe and let others believe what they
> > believe? Why do you want to force them to believe
> > something else, even if just theoretically?
> 
> Why are you so protective of your own belief
> system that you can't let go of it even just for
> the sake of a discussion?

Why are you so aggressive about imposing
your belief system on others that you 
demand that they agree to yours -- at
least theoretically -- before *having* 
the discussion?

It seems to me that the only reason you'd
want to do that is because you want to 
"prove yourself right."

I don't have any such need with my beliefs.
I don't think Curtis does either. Why do you?



Reply via email to