--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > "Also when Nadar Ram said that all of the dwellers in Heaven were > > welcoming Maharishi with open arms that it was not just some phrase to > > uplift our hearts. It is the reality. Bevan said that this kind of > > thing is "beyond our ken," but for some reason Maharishi was not > > absorbed into the Absolute. He went to Heaven to live in the most > > glorious manner that the Creator and all the Gods could bestow. Even > > they are amazed at all that he accomplished. " > > > > Oh reaaaaaaaaaaaaly? > > > > That one got me too. How do they presume to know where he > > went and what those dwelling there are thinking? > > More important, how do they completely ignore > the content of that Maharishi Humboldt talk > that was so recently posted here, that explains > in detail his theory that an enlightened being > cannot NOT be absorbed into the Absolute. He > categorically denied in that talk that any > other possibility existed. > > He said this many, many times over the years. > > And yet within a week of his death, Bevan is > rewriting Maharishi's own dogma completely, and > people are allowing it to pass as if nothing > had happened. > > Not a good sign...
No he did not. Contrary to what you claim Bevan said that Maharishi went to heaven.
