--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh reaaaaaaaaaaaaly?
> > 
> > That one got me too. How do they presume to know where 
> > he went and what those dwelling there are thinking?
> 
> 
> I think it has a bit of a sinister vibe, the ability to 
> continue to speak with Maharishi's authority from beyond 
> the grave, all channeled from Raja Ram. (love that nose Tony)  

Furthermore, it's the first step to what I 
have been predicting all along -- being able
to talk TO Maharishi in Brahmaloka and thus
still be able to say, "Maharishisez."

Mark my words. That's going to be next.

> The movement is about to lose its last shred of authenticity 
> as they grasp onto this final fantasy.
> 
> Hopping is flying,
> 
> Maharishi's death doesn't mean he is dead.

Next comes, "Bevan isn't fat; he's just manifesting
fullness."  :-)


> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:27 AM
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bevan's call to the dome & Satyanand
> quote...
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > "Also when Nadar Ram said that all of the dwellers in Heaven were
> > welcoming Maharishi with open arms that it was not just some phrase to
> > uplift our hearts. It is the reality. Bevan said that this kind of
> > thing is "beyond our ken," but for some reason Maharishi was not
> > absorbed into the Absolute. He went to Heaven to live in the most
> > glorious manner that the Creator and all the Gods could bestow. Even
> > they are amazed at all that he accomplished. "
> > 
> > Oh reaaaaaaaaaaaaly?
> > 
> > That one got me too. How do they presume to know where he went and
what
> > those dwelling there are thinking?
> > 
> > 
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1275 - Release Date:
> 2/12/2008
> > 3:20 PM
> >
>


Reply via email to