--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I am confused. If so, sorry.... Yes, coercion does imply 
force
> against one's will which I oppose in virtually all circumstances, 
not
> just in relationship/sexual situations. Are you stating that in the
> presence of an obvious power differential, coercion *must* exist? I
> acknowledge the possibility but understand that it is not 
necessarily
> part of the equation in the real world between two adults. A wise 
teacher
> may be sexually inexperienced, naive in intimate relationships, 
whereas
> her student may be well versed in those arts and mature in many 
ways....
> should a relationship develop between them, is it always wrong? I 
think
> not. And who is to say which party is really wielding the most 
power?
> I've known a number of women who would think it laughable to 
suggest that
> they are being taken advantage of when in a relationship with a
> "powerful" man. Relationships aren't so simple and just because the
> potential for something (coercion) exists doesn't mean it does in 
fact.
> 
Hi Don, I agree with much of what you say here. It really comes down 
to being ethical, regardless of the power relationship between two 
people, for whatever end. If dishonesty, misrepresentation, or 
coercion are involved, better not to do it, from either side.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to