--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > I didn't say it was of no value. I said I don't see > > why the state is "higher." If I experience two > > radically different states of consciousness at will, > > then why would I call one higher than the other? They > > are different. They each have their points. The fact > > that there are different states and that I can > > experience them tells me that there must be a deeper > > reality than any of them. > > > I agree. I don't like the term higher states of consciousness. As > plainly descriptive as it is of energy flow, it is almost always > misinterpreted as a value judgment. > > A more descriptive term would be progressive states of consciousness, > because established non-dual awareness certainly progresses from dual > awareness. >
Well, actually, dual-awareness originated from non-dual awareness, according to MMY's Vedic Cosmology... Lawson
