Well, there's another example of how worthless it is to try to have a conversation about experiences of "other" states of consciousness.
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela > Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > a person in unity according to your understanding > no > > longer experiences life? My understanding is that > one > > does still experience life, but knowledge is > certainly > > different in that state. I don't experience the > world > > as separate from me. Another way of saying the > same > > thing is that I don't experience "me" as located > in > > only the body I inhabit in this life. > > > > Mi mi mi mi... > > Ahem. > > La la la la. > > same old song. > > > Lawson > > > > > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela > > > Mailander <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I didn't say it was of no value. I said I > don't > > > see > > > > why the state is "higher." If I experience > two > > > > radically different states of consciousness at > > > will, > > > > then why would I call one higher than the > other? > > > They > > > > are different. They each have their points. > The > > > fact > > > > that there are different states and that I can > > > > experience them tells me that there must be a > > > deeper > > > > reality than any of them. > > > > > > > > > > Well, unity isn't "an" experience, according to > my > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > Lawson > > > > > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
