Please name one thing Sri Sri has personally accomplished.
----- Original Message -----
From: Louis McKenzie
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Brahmachari Nandikeeshore should be the Guru
after MMY!
Maharishi's Successor is already a master in his own rite. No matter who
puts on a funny suit or some one decides to call his successor. Maharishi's
successor was born from Maharishi and has established himself as a world
renowned Guru.
The process with normal minded people is one wherein they will eventually
fall to personal problems. There was no spiritual figure that Maharishi
actually named as his successor. Niether Tony Nader or Nandikeeshore can do
what Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has done. I think Maharishi being Maharishi sent
him out on purpose.
curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was at the Yugoslavia course where Nandkashore seemed to be being
groomed for taking over. He really wasn't up to the task
intellectually. When he went out with Purusha to give Intro lectures
it was a total disaster. The guy may never have attended school after
lower grades and his ability to stay on message was incorrigible. I
think he would be an innocent among wolves around Bevan and the other
power trippers.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "bojamuna" wrote:
>
> Although Tony Nader is a good person I believe the only logical and
> appropriate solution to the problem of Maharishi-jee's succession
> would be Brahmachari Nandikeeshore, and amazing devotee and
> extremely dignified person with a rare combination of spirituality
> and humor. It's a dissapointment he is not mentioned "even" as a
> Raja. I don't want to speculate why (he's not Shrivastava but no
> other Shrivastawas was apointed either)...
> Also: Raja för India: Harris Kaplan - not even an Indian. He is said
> to have donated amazing amounts to the Indian TMO, but does that
> qualify him to lead India to glory?
> Anyway "no hard feelings"... Sab bhaagya rekha mei likha hei.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Louis McKenzie wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe in some months more and more Tm meditators will find
> there
> > > way to the Art of Living??? I was realizing that maybe
> Maharishi
> > > was not senile when he ousted Chopra and denounced Sri Sri
> Ravi.
> > > Maybe it was for them to go out in the world and do as they
> have
> > > done. Now it is not a question of Ravi's ambition or Chopra's
> > > need for glory that would make them adopt so many of us.
> Maybe
> > > the Royal Highness of Rajah Ram will be there to reflect the
> design
> > > of ideal and to provide world guidance from the level of the
> > > unified field. Yet the actual guru maybe will be SRI SRI.
> > >
> > > I can not see Tony Nader as a guru..... Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
> has
> > > proven himself.......
> >
> > You can't help but wonder that.
> >
> > Of course in a very real sense, the Art of Living Foundation
> already
> > IS the new TM movement. They've got the numbers, they've got the
> > excitement and they've got one hell of a nice guru.
> >
> > TM 2.0 as I like to call it.
> >
>
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
