Great teacher? Maha=great rishi=seer in the sense of prophet. It doesn't mean "teacher."
--- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, netineti3 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. Ed" > <the_edvark@> wrote: > > > > > > I haven't found g guru I'd trust with my > mind/money/life. > > > Maharishi's "Wisdom" seemed to me circuitous and > self serving. > What > > > he did was take a lot of money and tell a lot of > lies. Whatever > good > > > there is or has come from the TM movement > (hasn't really been a > > > movement for a while now) they TMers would do > well to say > goodbye to > > > the guru and acknowledge his imperfections. > > > > > > I have often wished there wasn't such insistance > on MMY's > divinity. I > > > like meditation, spiritual developement and > fellowship but I > can't > > > cope with the idea of being associated with so > much intentional > > > dishonesty. And yet some of my favorite people > anywhere are in > the > > > domes everyday. I'm rather divided. > > > > Every time you use the word "maharishi" to > describe this man you > _are_ > > innocently contributing to that Divination. > > > > He told us he was not a personal guru. > > > > Kali yuga is wrought with these lies. > > > > All the best to you. > > > exsqueeze me? maharishi just means great teacher. > there is no > divination even implied, and even if there is, > everyone comes from > That and is That. what's the issue? because he's > human? > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
