[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemp gets his facts wrong

[Richard J. Williams]

> > Weeping for people is natural, and having 
> > compassion is a good thing, but no weeping 
> > for god is still a different thing - if you 
> > had Bhakti you would know - its obvious 
> > you don't. 
> 
> Yeah, it's too bad you're so unevolved.  :-)
>
TurqoiseB wrote: 
> Uh, Michael, there are a number of spiritual 
> traditions out there who look at *bhakti* as
> less evolved. That is, the seekers who need 
> a *form* to feel close to, love, or identify
> with just haven't evolved to the point where
> they can feel all those things for the formless
> Absolute.
>
So, you're thinking that there's a "formless
Absolute" in Buddhism, but there's no "bhakti"
to worship the Lord Buddha? This doesn't make
any sense. Didn't the Lord Buddha teach bhakti
and the absence of an Absolute? It sounds like
Barry is confused.