Although the title of this thread doesn't refer specifically to what I thought it would be about (and, you know, Judy can't exist on this planet for more than about 30 seconds without invoking the word "lie" or else she'll explode), I do think "lying" will end up being Barack's undoing in the general election if he ends up as the candidate.
Why? Because it's now pretty clear that he lied about what he knew and when he knew it vis a vis the Rev. Wrong affair. Within the space of a few days, he backed off his original HuffPo statement that he only knew about the controversial declarations when he started his presidential campaign. Then, a few days later, he amended that because, obviously, one of his advisers took him aside and said: you better not say something that they're gonna uncover as untrue later on... Well, if during the general election he starts getting caught in MORE lies, the sheen of "innocent as the virgin snow" that he has worn up to now and which has been one of his strongest points is gonna disappear as fast as bullshit out of the anus of a bull. And then he's no longer gonna be JFK-elect but just another lyin's politician out to say anything that will get him elected. Oh, and when exactly IS Obama gonna bomb Pakistan? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From an Obama campaign email sent out on March 20: > > ...Barack is now facing a two-front battle against Senators Clinton and > McCain. Both are reading from the same political playbook as they > attack Barack on foreign policy. They have both dismissed his call for > renewed diplomacy as "naive" while mistakenly standing behind George > Bush's policy of non-engagement that just isn't working.... > > David Plouffe > Campaign Manager > > As the Obama campaign knows, what was dismissed as > "naive" was his assertion that he would be willing > in his first term to engage in direct talks with > rogue nations without any preconditions. > > Hillary has sharply criticized Bush's policy of > nonengagement. For Obama to claim she "stands behind > it" is an outright lie. >
