--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As for the comment about the 9+ inches, that's a > > pretty telling remark, the big smile notwithstanding. > > Telling in more ways than one. Part of the historical persecution of > black men is fueled by the myths of the super sexual, super sized, > savage who could never be trusted around white women. The stereotype > cuts both ways and I am always surprised when black men try to > perpetuate this myth. Black women I have dated informed me that it is > just a myth. Case by case a man may have reason to brag about his > mighty member, but to try to make the case based on racial stereotypes > just buys into racial ignorance IMO. > > The only objective data I have on race and size is from Trojan condom > manufacturer. They DO make a smaller size for Asian countries. They > also find that men often fall for a condom labeled Magnum, Supra or XL > no matter what their size. I guess it's like when they label women's > clothes a size smaller than they really are!
Well, within the product line of a given manufacturer, the label accurately reflects the relative sizes or such has been my observation/experience. > > On a more explicit note, the Kama Sutra has the size issue right. > Mice should sleep with mice, rabbits with rabbits, and deer with deer. > THAT'S how we do the hokey pokey! > Let me tell you the story about Long Cock Man, and Tooth-vagina Woman... Lawson
