Okay, we're done. You're not reading, you're not learning, and you're wasting both our times.
Have fun believing you stuff. Given your recent threads, I'll take a wild guess and say that you don't have any friends who know any better than you, or if they do, they've gotten to know how you think and have given up, as I do, now, officially, trying to correct your views. Geeze at this rate, I'm saving myself a lot of angst by letting you, Shemp, the War Monger, Off etc. just spew and spew the goofiest stuff. Richard, you could have at least read the whole articles at wiki that I referred you to instead of just the first sentence. You're hooking onto a fact here, a fact there, but ignoring most of the subtleties and then concluding about reality based on only a couple facts. And you have totally not countered many of my explanations. Hmmm, what other researchers do that sort of "science?" Sigh..... If I could get about ten of the folks here to start posting at another Yahoo group that bans trolls and dunderheads, I'd never read another post here. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > As I believe said, Hawking discussed it in connection with > the fermi paradox mainly as entertainment, so don't cancel > the pension plan. > > Nobody ever said it was likely but it is possible, as the first > paragraph of your article states; > > "But the chance of planetary annihilation by this means "is totally > miniscule," experimental physicist Greg Landsberg" > > 50,000,000,000 to 1 against was never worth losing sleep over. > It's just a bit of fun. > > > Still no opinion on my "Only carboniferous period gave humans > enough free energy and materials to develop serious technology, > and is a possible solution to the Fermi paradox" theory? > > I've been googling for a bit and no one else seems to > link the lack of one with Fermi, I'm on to something I reckon. > Will keep you posted, maybe I can increase my projected IQ > to more than 40 points. >
