Louis read this, it explains why Obama did not bounce: http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/2008/09/01/palin-designation-nullifies- obama-bounce/
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dont understand the polls how is it that a guy can have 84000 people in a foot ball stadium have all the things in the convention and not move in the polls... Even McCain can have this stupid situation with the bimbo and still the polls dont change.????? > > --- On Tue, 9/2/08, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama's bounce smaller than others > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2008, 1:15 PM > > I'm wondering if Judy wasn't right all along. > Maybe Hillary was the better choice all along > and Barack is unelectable. The way this is, > McCain won't even need to fix the Diabold > machines. > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/13068 > > "Barack Obama's post-Democratic National Convention bounce in the > polls appears to be > slightly smaller than the norm of past conventions, and it's gradually > depreciating." > > "On Saturday, Gallup reported Obama was ahead by 8 percentage points. By > Monday, that > lead had shrunk to 5 points. " > > " Obama's 3-point bounce exceeds that of John F. Kerry, the Democratic > presidential > nominee in 2004 who did not rise in the polls following his convention. But > Obama's > bounce is less than a third of what Al Gore received in 2000 and Bill Clinton > received in > 1992. Even Bob Dole, following the 1996 Republican convention, received a > 4-point > bounce in the polls, 1 point more than Obama." > > > ------------------------------------ > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links >
