Barry thinks he's in with the in crowd. Funny guy. He never tires of himself even when others do. True to form, his sense of self-importance, and pathological self-absorption, compels him to believe you're not smart enough to figure out who should be on your preferred reading list. Note: The riff-raff on the second list makes his panties bunch up and gives him fits of pique. So, if you want to have some fun just poke him a few times and you can be on his shit list too. Welcome! Jump into the fray and let the fur fly.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > I can't say exactly why Barry or anyone else comes on > > FFL, but for me it's a way of relaxing, getting in a few > > jokes, making a few sage (as opposed to, say, parsley > > or rosemary) observations. I imagine the same *might* > > be true for Barry and many others here. > > Just might. > > > So, in that spirit, new, if you don't like or agree with > > someone or their posting style to the degree that > > you appear not to, why not just skip those posts? > > Two lists of people. First list (not meant > to be comprehensive, just a few names that > pop to mind): > * Rick > * Curtis > * Sal > * Hugo/Richard > * Alex > * bhairitu > * boo_lives > * gullible fool > * do.rflex > * Vaj > * Ruth > * Dr. Pete > * Tom T. > * geezerfreak > > Second list: > * raunchydog > * Judy > * Willytex > * Shemp > * new.morning > > First list -- tend to just speak their mind and > then let it drop. Rarely get involved in "defending" > what they say. Rarely "demand" that people respond > to them or "take them seriously." Take themselves > lightly. Energy givers. > > Second list -- speak their minds and wait for, nay, > *demand* a response. Get angry if no one responds. > Once angry, demand that the people who ignored > the profound or provocative things they said before > do so now. If someone bites, attempt to steer the > conversation to what *they* want to talk about, and > call any tangent or variation that the other person > wants to talk about a "non-sequitur," as if the other > person is somehow supposed to follow *them*, and if > they don't, that "doesn't follow." Energy vampires. > > Where should I spend my time and my energy on this > forum, eh? Talking to the people on the first list, > or on the second list? > > Well, duh. >
