> He's also a bit away from the"river of knowledge," to show he's not a direct part> of the Tradition, or so I interpret the visual symbolism. > > Lawson
He was the only living guy. That was the difference. We have about one million hours of Maharishi claiming to be representing this tradition in all its fullness. I have never heard him ever utter the slightest hint that he believed your interpretation. He thought of himself as the most important person of history. Guru Dev's greatest accomplishment (according to Maharishi himself) was to have made Maharishi. Maharishi loved Maharishi more than any of his sycophants could have. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > -snip- > > > > "Heaven will walk on earth in this generation." > > > > - Maharishi > > > > > > > I wonder if he spoke this while sitting down? ha-ha > > > > Probably. Maharishi never refferred to himself as some sort of avatar > > or something very special. > > > > If you look at the official "Tradition of Masters' painting he commissioned, MMY > is the only human standing, the only guy in white and the only one making > offerings to someone else (Gurudev). > > > He's also a bit away from the"river of knowledge," to show he's not a direct part > of the Tradition, or so I interpret the visual symbolism. > > Lawson >
