>From her conservative point of view, she knew exactly what Reagan
meant, that socialism is a threat to freedom. Palin's speech indeed
refers to impending socialism and loss of freedom. In my advancing
years, I'm all for preserving Medicare, Social Security and believe we
need universal healthcare. These are essential social safety nets.
However, the recent pork laden bailout, forced on taxpayers, sets the
stage for Obama to scrap any program protecting the most basic of
human needs and nationalize everything from soup to nuts. Get use to
it, it's what's for dinner, served up by Obama's youth corps.
http://tinyurl.com/3z7llj 

If you're willing to become a serf in an Obama administration, you get
to eat and if not, you're fucked. Become a true believing member of
the Obama Party and you will prosper. Members of the Baath Party,
Communist Party, and Nazi Party did well and non-party member got the
shitty end of the stick.  The cult of Obama's personality and
demagoguery it engenders is a danger to our country. 

Welcome comrades to US of KKK A http://tinyurl.com/4fmt7s and God Damn
America while you're at it. http://tinyurl.com/4f6prc

Despite the bailout, we still face the possibility of hyperinflation
and economic collapse. As big banks bulge bigger and the little guy
picks up the tab, soon we will owe our indentured servant lives to the
state and burn dollars for heat in the winter. Get ready for the
Amero. http://tinyurl.com/ynsxbl

"Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized. In
the first, it is ridiculed, in the second it is opposed, in the third
it is regarded as self-evident."  ~Arthur Schopenhauer


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This Annie
> > Oakley is sharp too, 
> 
> ***********
> 
> Yeah, she real sharp:
> 
> "In her closing remarks at the vice-presidential debate Thursday 
> night, Ms. Palin referred earnestly, if loosely, to a quote from 
> Ronald Reagan. He had warned that if Americans weren't vigilant in 
> protecting their freedom, they would find themselves spending 
> their "sunset years telling our children and our children's children 
> what it was like in America when men were free."
> 
> What Ms. Palin didn't say was that the menace to freedom that Reagan 
> was talking about was Medicare. As the historian Robert Dallek has 
> pointed out, Reagan "saw Medicare as the advance wave of socialism, 
> which would `invade every area of freedom in this country.' "
> 
> Does Ms. Palin agree with that Looney Tunes notion? Or was this just 
> another case of the aw-shucks, darn-right, I'm-just-a-hockey-mom 
> governor of Alaska mouthing something completely devoid of meaning?
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/opinion/04herbert.html
>


Reply via email to