here's my take on that. once a person becomes enlightened they become a natural advocate for such a state- i have no idea why- it just happens, and i've watched it happen to enough people that i think i can state it as a trend. and since Kundalini markers are flashy and come with their own set of dictinctive sensory experiences, they are a useful way to engage the mind in making enlightenment appealing. particularly in waking state, the mind wants to know something about enlightenment that will compel it forward. so Kundalini markers are a great advertisement.
however it is not the Kundalini markers that are particularly important. it is planting the seed of desire for enlightenment within the seeker that is important, so that the seeker can hopefully be compelled in this lifetime or the next to continue seeking enlightenment until the goal is reached. and so the question becomes, who is it important to, that we become addicted to achieving enlightenment? if we define enlightenment as being in constant alignment with the universal flow, the cosmic purpose, that also becomes the motivator. it is the vast cosmos, with its endless galaxies and timelessness that through its innate intelligence compels each of us forward, one at a time, to merge with it. some call it god and some don't but it easily transcends our isolated selves and inexorably seduces us to seamlessly join It. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -snip- > Yeah, but what the hell good is all that without having all the > Kundalini markers? > -snip-
