Sahemp:

> Oh, really, Cult Member #203847.
> 
> Pray tell, what is his name?

Yeah, getting out of the CIA when you have been working as an
undercover operative is just like getting off an email list.  You just
check the box for: "no more CIA contact" and they just leave you alone
from that point on.  It's just that simple!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
> > wrote:
> >  Ironically, the TM teachers were often accused of being "CIA" by 
> the 
> > > government.  I say ironically because this was around the time 
> that 
> > > MMY developed his paranoia about CIA operatives infiltrating the 
> > TMO.
> > 
> > Paranoia ? It was a fact. I personally know one fellow, now on 
> > Purusha, who worked for CIA: he was caught redhanded with envelopes 
> > of reports.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Oh, really, Cult Member #203847.
> 
> Pray tell, what is his name?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Maharishi asked him if he would give it up and he said 
> > yes. This is now about 30 years ago and his involvement with the 
> CIA 
> > was never mentioned later. Apparently Maharishi simply said he 
> should 
> > just forget about it.
> 
> 
> 
> How convenient.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > And the two crew-cut and armed with pistols americans caught on the 
> > bridge to the Kulm in 1976 did not come from the Salvation Army.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Okay.
> 
> So you allege that the CIA -- operatives and employees of a foreign 
> government -- violated the sovereignty of Switzerland, an obvious and 
> serious crime.
> 
> Where and when was this reported, please.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Nor the fellows who called Indian Mayors just before the visit from 
> > the group later to become american Purusha in 1982 and warned them 
> > about a very dangerous group which was about to vist their towns. 
> > Info only a few Purusha-fellows would have.
> > 
> > The list of inscidents is long. Very long.
> 
> 
> 
> Okay, then, if the list is "long, very long" it shouldn't be too 
> difficult for you to come up with, say, 5 more incidents.
> 
> Cite them, please, with accompanying docuementation of their veracity.
> 
> I thank you in advance for responding to my requests for information, 
> Nabby....
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
>


Reply via email to