The breakdown for voting is always by ward. There are 12 wards.
Cedar/Center is one ward. The county doesn't distinguish one voter
from another when they show up at the polls. Wards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, are
in the city of Fairfield. The rest are rural. If you look at the rural
wards, they voted for McCain. Vedic City is in a rural ward so it's
not surprising, minus the absentee ballots, their ward broke slightly
for McCain. Since Earl and Will had strong support from Vedic City and
they had a large turn out for absentee ballots which did not tally by
ward, it suggests Vedic City probably voted for Obama. If you want a
more accurate analysis, see the County Auditor. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> City of Fairfield's five wards:
> 
> > > Ward 1 Obama 247 McCain 232
> > > Ward 2 (MUM) Obama 233 McCain 53
> > > Ward 3 Obama 240 McCain 146
> > > Ward 4 Obama 217 McCain 129
> > > Ward 5 Obama 263 McCain 257
> 
> Townships in Jefferson County: 
> 
> > > Blackhawk/Polk Obama 94 McCain 226
> 
> > > Buchanan Obama 69 McCain 154
> 
> > > Cedar/Center (Vedic City) Obama 219 McCain 271
> 
> > > Libertyville/DesMoines Obama 142 McCain 293
> 
> > > Locust Grove/Batavia Obama 129 McCain 161
> 
> > > Lockridge/Roundpairie Obama 114 McCain 249
> 
> > > Walnut/Penn Obama 94 McCain 177
> 
> ********
> 
> Vedic City voting is not broken out separately here -- two townships, 
> Cedar ( http://www.city-data.com/township/Cedar-Jefferson-IA.html ) 
> and Center appear to be lumped together, so it's not possible from 
> these stats to know how actual VC residents voted. 
> 
> Since 1055 of VC residents are pundits from India who cannot vote 
> (plus other foreign national rus), the actual number of eligible 
> voters in VC is small.
> 
> The Census bureau estimate in 2006 was that about 222 people, 
> including children, of course, lived in VC, but that would also 
> include some non-ru farmers and others, who tended to be for McCain 
> out in the sticks of Jefferson County, as the stats for other 
> townships above show.
>


Reply via email to