--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > God doesn't love the householder unless he/she is celibate? God > > doesn't love people who have sex? God doesn't love the natural order > > of His/Her Creation, BillyG? Yer kidding, right? > > > > How do you suppose Arjuna had many sons by different wives, eh? > > ...multiple Immaculate Conceptions? > > I'm glad you ask, you seem to fundamentally misunderstand the > principles I was putting forth, or perhaps I explained them poorly. > Here's the deal, there is a time and place for everything! The *time* > for sex is in the Vedic Grahasta (householder) period of life for the > purpose of family and procreation. > > The complete elimination of sex is a red herring used by the ego
Uh... didn't you recently claim that you've personally eliminated sex, BillyG? (even > Arjuna) to cleverly distort the issue. No one is asking us to give up > sex, only to use it in its proper context in harmony with the laws of > nature, as is the case with all of the senses. God didn't give sex to > man to use as a tool of enjoyment or entertainment, it is a holy act > which product is another human being. Are you now a fundy preacher too?
