--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > To All: > > > > It appears that this pastor is trying to grab the headlines for his > > church coffers. Also, the challenge may not be good for the > > participants, considering the ayurvedic principle that losing the > > body's ojas may be detrimental to one's health. > > Have you ever considered the possibility that > the ayurvedic principle that "losing the body's > ojas may be detremental to one's health," besides > being in direct contradiction to medical studies > that show that frequent ejaculation *significantly* > reduces the risk of prostate cancer, might have > more than a passing resemblance to anal retention? > > Some people get so weird that they're afraid to > shit. They hold onto those turds as long as > humanly possible, and come up with all sorts of > rationalizations for their behavior. But the > behavior is usually viewed as an aberration, and > an indication of poor mental health. > > Some people get so weird that they're afraid to > ejaculate. Some have convinced themselves doing > so is "bad for their health," and come up with > not only rationalizations for their behavior, > but "teachings" that claim that hanging onto > their semen with the same fervor that an anal > retentive individual hangs onto their shit is > beneficial to their spiritual progress. *On this > forum* people have claimed that doing this is > *essential* to become enlightened. > > And yet the latter behavior is rarely spoken of > as an aberration and an indicator of poor mental > health. How...uh...cum? :-) > ok, got the gross out post...for the record, ew.
next, you are scheduled to post a bright shiny piece about either: 1) a time when you met a celebrity, or 2) a special 'spiritual' story, or 3) a travelogue. or if my timing is slightly off, possibly another thoughtful diatribe about caricatures with negative traits.
