--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > To All: > > > > > > > > It appears that this pastor is trying to grab the headlines for > > > > his church coffers. Also, the challenge may not be good for > > > > the participants, considering the ayurvedic principle that > > > > losing the body's ojas may be detrimental to one's health. > > > > > > Have you ever considered the possibility that > > > the ayurvedic principle that "losing the body's > > > ojas may be detremental to one's health," besides > > > being in direct contradiction to medical studies > > > that show that frequent ejaculation *significantly* > > > reduces the risk of prostate cancer, might have > > > more than a passing resemblance to anal retention? > > > > > > Some people get so weird that they're afraid to > > > shit. They hold onto those turds as long as > > > humanly possible, and come up with all sorts of > > > rationalizations for their behavior. But the > > > behavior is usually viewed as an aberration, and > > > an indication of poor mental health. > > > > > > Some people get so weird that they're afraid to > > > ejaculate. Some have convinced themselves doing > > > so is "bad for their health," and come up with > > > not only rationalizations for their behavior, > > > but "teachings" that claim that hanging onto > > > their semen with the same fervor that an anal > > > retentive individual hangs onto their shit is > > > beneficial to their spiritual progress. *On this > > > forum* people have claimed that doing this is > > > *essential* to become enlightened. > > > > > > And yet the latter behavior is rarely spoken of > > > as an aberration and an indicator of poor mental > > > health. How...uh...cum? :-) > > > > ok, got the gross out post...for the record, ew. > > > > next, you are scheduled to post a bright shiny piece about either: > > > > 1) a time when you met a celebrity, or > > 2) a special 'spiritual' story, or > > 3) a travelogue. > > > > or if my timing is slightly off, possibly another thoughtful > > diatribe about caricatures with negative traits. > > T'would seem that someone is so caught up in > "bash Barry" mode that she can't tell "out of > the box thinking" from a "gross out." :-) > > I'm perfectly serious here. > -snip-
i consider celibacy unnatural in most if not all cases. you are grossing me out with your writing- i find your box inside or out absurdly limited. rather than bashing you, i was goading you to go in a direction that i hoped would surprise me.
