--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > > There is no question who started this fight, and
> > > why.
> > 
> > Right, John did, wildly overreacting to a little
> > tweak from me.
> 
> How many times have you protested to this group that Barry 
> "started" a rally of exchanges by insulting you Judy? That 
> your reaction was compelled by his negitive characterization 
> of you that you HAD to correct in the name of fairness?
> ...
> Your shot at John was just that, a shot. Trying to spin it 
> as a "tweek" doesn't work given your history of rancor. 
> ...
> I hope you will think about this a bit Judy and be honest 
> with yourself. I'm willing to speak up if someone takes an 
> unfair shot at you first. But not if you are not going to 
> be honest about the shots you take. We all do our share 
> of this so believe me I am not unaware of my own black 
> pot status on this stove.  And you can and do call me
> out when I'm being a bit slippery.
> 
> I think you are being a bit slippery here. 

As the vocalist in a bluegrass group I 
used to like was fond of saying, "Slipprier
than deer guts on a pump handle."

For the record, and to declare an absolute
level of comfort with my own blackpottedness,
my first post this morning was, in fact, a
shot at Judy. It wasn't a "tweak," it was 
a full-fledged shot.

But that was the only one. The two "occult"
posts were written with a *group* of people
in mind. For someone in that group to believe 
that the posts were only about them is self 
importance, and deprives the other members
of the group of their share of Attention
credit.  :-)



Reply via email to