On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:49 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:11 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
To be supported by Natural Law is, IMO, wrongly
understood by most TMers, because they don't get the source of
this
idea. -snip-
you are off on a tangent here-- i didn't mention the natural law
angle, nor dharma, nor the laws of manu. all straw men.
Hey, it's not my fault you didn't understand the origin of the
term.
It's been a part of MMY's teaching for quite some time. In fact I
believe it used to be the name of a MMY booklet: "Life Supported
by
Natural Law".
are all Buddhists as evasive as you are?
Don't try to hide your intellectual dishonesty and obfuscation behind
ad hominems Dawn.
