--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote:
>
> 
>
> 
> Their conclusion? Some were able to "be in the present", that is some  
> of them had gained some basic awareness. That's all. Otherwise they  
> were superficially compassionate but seemingly nice people, but  
> largely ego-bound. The ability to be 'in the present' was then  
> combined with language popular among Neoadvaita teachers and of  
> course, self-fulfilling prophecies of what MMY talked about. The  
> person was little impressed. There was a lot of "one upmanship", "my  
> enlightenment trumps your enlightenment" going on.

:)









Reply via email to