Hope is great.
When one 'hits the field', it's passion to get the job done, meeting the 
challenges
as they surely will come incessantly.  At the end of day and the beginning of 
the 
next - push the hope button.  People should enjoy the moment, but be vigilant 
for
the shadowy and invisible rocks and barriers on the path.
Arhata











    
            What's wrong with hope?



After eight years, nay, three decades of shuck and jive presidents,

along comes one who truly offers a different approach, and yet

naysayers are panicking and tarring our new guy with a broad brush

before he's even done with his first day in office.



What's wrong with hoping for a few days, a few weeks, a few months

that this guy can bootstrap us all into a higher intent?



All these years, and now we have these folks with buckets of cold

water to toss on our flames of passion.  WTF?



If this were a foxhole, and someone started spewing this kind of

negativity, he'd be slapped upside the head, right?  



Indulge in panic all you want out there, but I'm taking a few days off

from this and partying down.



Even if I'm wrong, I'll get a nice buzz out of the deal while those

cringing at the other side of the foxhole will be miserable during

that time.  I ask you, who more profits?  



Me sez me does.



Give the guy a break.  All signs still point to him holding the reins

firmly, and he's going to kick the ass of anyone under him who doesn't

get his vision.  I predict someone is going to get into it with Obama

and be tossed out in short order.



Edg



--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, arhatafreespeech@ ... wrote:

>

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>     

>             

> 

> 

> Time to temper the euphoria with commonsense and avoid delusion! Is

the author a bit pessimestic? It's positive to be vigilant and, find

ways to participate in 'giving back'.

> Arhata

> Is it just me? 

> 

>  

> 

> Gerald Warner 

> 

> Telegraph.co. uk 

> 

>  

> 

>  

> 

> Barack Obama inauguration: this Emperor has no clothes, it will all

end in tears 

> 

>  

> 

>  

> 

> This will end in tears. The Obama hysteria is not merely

embarrassing to witness, it is itself contributory to the scale of the

disaster that is coming. What we are experiencing, in the deepening

days of a global depression, is the desperate suspension of disbelief

by people of intelligence - la trahison des clercs - in a pathetic

effort to hypnotise themselves into the delusion that it will be all

right on the night. It will not be all right.

> We have been here before. In the spring of 1997, to be precise, when

a charismatic, young prime minister entered Downing Street, cheered by

children bussed in for the occasion waving plastic Union Jacks. A very

few of us at that time incurred searing reproaches for denouncing the

Great Charlatan (as I have always denominated Tony Blair) and

dissenting from the public hysteria. Three times a deluded Britain

elected that transparent fraud. Yesterday, when national bankruptcy

became a formal reality, we reaped the bitter harvest of the

Blair/Brown imposture.

> The burnt child, contrary to conventional wisdom, does not fear the

fire. After the Blair experience there is no excuse for anybody in

Britain falling for Obama. Yet today, in this country, even some of

those who remained sane during the emotional spasm of the Diana

aberration are pumping the air for Princess Barack. At a time of gross

economic and geopolitical instability throughout the Western world,

this is beyond irresponsibility.

> To anyone who kept his head, the string of Christmas cracker mottoes

booming through the public address system on Washington's National

Mall can only excite scepticism. It is crucial to recall the reality

that lies behind the rhetoric. Denouncing "those who seek to advance

their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents" comes ill

from a man whose flagship legislation, the Freedom of Choice Act, will

impose abortion, including partial-birth abortion, on every state in

the Union. It seems the era of Hope is to be inaugurated with a

slaughter of the innocents.

> Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan is like one of those

toxic packages traded by bankers: it camouflages many unaffordable

gifts to his client state. With a federal deficit already at $1.2

trillion, Obama wants to squander $825 billion (which will undoubtedly

mushroom to more than $1 trillion) on creating 600,000 more government

jobs and a further 459,000 in "green energy" (useless wind turbines

and other Heath-Robinson contraptions favoured by Beltway

environmentalists) .

> It is frightening to think there is a real possibility that the

entire world economy could go into complete meltdown and famine kill

millions. Yet Western - and British - commentators are cocooned in a

warm comfort zone of infatuation with America's answer to Neil

Kinnock. We should be long past applauding politicians of any hue:

they got us into this mess. The best deserve a probationary

opportunity to prove themselves, the worst should be in jail.

> It is questionable whether the present political system can survive

the coming crisis. Whatever the solution, teenage swooning

sentimentality over a celebrity cult has no part in it. The most

powerful nation on earth is confronting its worst economic crisis

under the leadership of its most extremely liberal politician, who has

virtually no experience of federal politics. That is not an

opportunity but a catastrophe.

> These are frank, even ungracious, words: they have the one merit

that, unlike almost everything else written today about Obama, they

will not require to be eaten in the future.

>




      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Reply via email to