--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my > > little chiquita. > > > > enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no > > longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of perception. > > > You know this sounds like a made-up problem to solve. I never met > anyone who was lost in or identified with the objects of perception. > Someone would have an unimaginable pathological lack of self awareness > for this to be a problem. > > I mean this seriously because it is one of the fundamental > presuppositions of Maharishi's teaching. Can anyone here remember > when this was a problem in your life before TM? I honestly can't. >
I agree. I was about to respond that fawning over a state of consciousness in which a person no longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of perception is like fawning over a SoC where I no longer trip over my untied shoelaces and don't blow buggers out my nose when i laugh (usually).
