nope, i refer to you as a monkey king because monkeys chatter, 
chatter, chatter about subjects they know nothing about, like you 
do. 

i don't personally care if you, (or anyone else here), agrees, 
disagrees with, believes or even concerns themselves with what i 
post. 

you are the one with issues, monkey, not me. here, have a banana!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> >
> > To All:
> > 
> > In this book, we find a story of a race of monkeys who helped 
> > Rama defeat Ravana and his ilk.  Since this story is supposedly 
> > millions of years old, is it possible that these monkies were 
> > the Neanderthals that existed eons of years ago?
> > 
> > Or, from the level of symbolism, do these monkies actually 
> > represent certain humans who have not learned to develop their 
> > consciousness, or those who have not reached the true human 
> > potential?
> 
> enlightened_dawn should pay attention to this.
> 
> According to John, this million-year-old book
> portrays monkeys as willing partners in genocide.
> They fought alongside Rama for eighteen months,
> until every member of the clan they decided had
> to be wiped from the face of the planet was dead.
> Some commentaries on the Ramayana say that this
> clan numbered over 100,000 people (the entire
> population of modern-day Sri Lanka), before 
> Rama decided in his Infinite Wisdom that they 
> needed to be exterminated.
> 
> I understand that you've been saying that in your
> view monkeys are warm and fuzzy and cuddly, and
> thus that's what you have in mind when you call
> people on this forum monkeys. But now you know
> the Truth, as revealed by this Holy Million-Year-
> Old Book. And as John has told us many, many times,
> this work is part of the Vedic Literature that is
> synonymous with Eternal Truth. Thus, according to
> this book of Eternal Truth, modern-day monkeys 
> are most likely descended from their counterparts
> in the Ramayana, who were practitioners of genocide.
> 
> Maybe you'd do better by calling the people who
> don't accept what *you* are saying as Eternal Truth
> "koala bears" instead. They're warm and fuzzy and
> cuddly, too, and they don't have a history of
> genocide. 
> 
> :-)
>


Reply via email to