and we have those, like me, and i suspect the majority of those who practice TM, who just don't know, and until something is proved one way or another, don't care-
unlike the Maharishi bashers who are content to climb into their igloos of ignorance and proclaim endlessly that the Maharishi did fuck around, and it is up to the rest of us to prove otherwise. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > My suspicion is that those who believe that Maharishi > > "couldn't possibly" have fucked around believe this > > because they believe he was enlightened and if the > > rumor were true, that would upset their definition > > of what enlightenment is. ( Which definition, it is > > good to remember, came from the guy who possibly > > fucked around. :-) > > > > The TBs don't believe the rumors because it would > > be "impossible" for them to be true. Sorta along > > the lines of, "If an enlightened being (and we > > assume as a given that MMY was one) tells us that > > he's a celibate monk, well the words of the enlight- > > ened are always true (and we know this because MMY > > told us so), then him fucking around is *impossible*." > > Or, you have those who believe that maybe he did maybe he didn't, but > if he did it was in accord with Nature, Which We Cannot Understand or > Comprehend Until We are Enlightened Too. >
