--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > Curtis writes in this, "I don't share his (Maharishi's) view > > that the silence experienced in meditation is our true nature or our > > real self." > > > > Ouch, is that right? True? > > Without the belief system mindset experiencing the silence of > meditation is not obviously my "true" nature or "real self." It is > just a state of mind I can experience. I don't know what it means but > I would not on my own assume it was a part of me that survives death > for example, or any of the other magical properties Maharishi ascribes > to it. > > Do you feel that it is your true nature or real self? Why?
If silence is more consistent than non-silence, how could you NOT identify it as being "more real" than non-silence? L.
