--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <yifux...@...> wrote: > > ---Very true Nab! Another reason is that in the Dzogzen teachings of > Vaj's Guru, Norbu Rinpoche, (as well as in Mahayana Buddhism as a > whole); there's no ideological distinction between the Void and > relative existence in the same way as in the "Brahman" concept (i.e. > two aspects of Brahman, relative and Absolute). > This pov carries over into the techniques of Buddhism and the > outlook. In Mindfulness, (you can see this in what Vaj is saying); > there's supposedly no blank TC or emptiness "separate" from relative > experience; but rather - from the very beginning! - a perfect fusion > of sensory experience and the Void. > Also, Vaj fancies himself in the Garab Dorje lineage, in which > there's a "direct transmission" of teachings but no intermediate type > of Shakti used as a carrier for the immediate Realization. > Such Vajian ideologies are fine in theory but break down in practice. > The mindfulness Buddhists may wind up have "no experience" at all - > just a blank mind. > Then, Vaj (in referring to the initial separateness of TC - that's > experienced in early experience) claims that the dualistic type of > transcendence is "disassociation".
> Clearly, Vaj is trying to compensate for the mediocre results of > his Garab Dorje/Norbu program by making false and twisted claims > about the programs which really do work. Very true. Vaj is just a fanatic "Buddhist" fundamentalist.
