--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wgm4u@> wrote: > <snip> > > Have you even known morally lazy meditators? I have, > > as if meditation alone was going to transform them > > and almost as if effort was a 'no-no', it's totally > > absurd what some TM'ers have been lead to think..... > > but then I guess without any ethical guidelines that > > is to be expected, sad. > > Nonsense. There's no lack of ethical guidelines in > this world. MMY didn't feel the need to come out > with his own set when there were so many already out > there. As you know, he recommended that if one needs > guidelines, one follow the laws of the land, the > prescriptions of one's religion, and the advice of > one's elders, plus "Never do what you think might be > wrong." > > A "morally lazy meditator" is just a morally lazy > person who meditates, ignoring (in the case of TMers) > MMY's excellent advice.
I think your point is well taken, even though what MMY said was on the margins...it was there! Touche! I would assume then, that you would agree with me that TM *alone* is not a complete system of spiritual unfoldment? Yes? That it, TM contains NO ethical guidelines per se, such as Yama and NiYama. Your point is that since MMY recommended other's guidelines One's Religion and your own intuition) that is sufficient...correct? If so, that is what I have been saying. Yes, taken with MMY's
