--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:14 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
> >
> > > sounds like HH the DL describes the Maharishi as an
> > > excellent and qualified teacher. good for him!
> >
> > Unfortunately for your skewed view of reality, it would
> > not appear to be the case.
>
> Unfortunately, it would appear to be the case
> that it's Vaj's view of reality that's skewed...
>
> > Errand boys and secretaries probably wouldn't fair so
> > well in spiritual matters,
>
> ...but maybe that's because he's such a snob.
>
> How about carpenters, Vaj? Would they "fair" [sic]
> well in spiritual matters?
>
> esp. as teachers possessing, at least,
> > relative knowledge. One wonders how to classify "having
> > sex with young members of the female gender" would fare
> > in such a synopsis?
>
> Oh, I don't think one wonders about this, do you?
>
> If you
> > can't meet the criteria of your "senses are
> > controlled. Otherwise your senses will be like wild
> > horses, pulling you into unfit actions", what does
> > that mean about lusting after young kids
>
> Notice how here Vaj fails to specify the gender or
> the age of the "kids." With any luck, those who read
> what he writes will think he means MMY was a
> pedophile alleged to have preyed on prepubescent
> boys, in addition to the young women he mentions
> above.
>
> Isn't that clever of Vaj?
>
> > and acquiring palaces in Holland (or wherever)
>
> Palaces?? Is Vaj referring to the old monastery
> at Vlodrop?
>
> to live in? And what's with the silk underwear?
> > Is that meant to restrain your senses? Where would
> > desire for world domination fall in all of this?
>
> Where would it fall in his silk underwear?
>
> ("World domination." Hilarious.)
>
> > Should we go through the criteria, one by one?
> >
> > I'd really enjoy that. Let's do it!
>
> Oh, yes, let's! Why don't we start with this:
>
> "If you cannot find anyone who has all of these
> attributes, at least find someone who has more
> good qualities than defects."
Very few give any response to the posts by this Buddhist
fundamentalist Vaj. He is ignored yet year after year he spends a lot
of time here with his foolish propaganda and downright lies. I
suppose he must be retired to have so much time on hand. Doen't he
have better things to do, walking dogs for example ? ;-)
Anyway I find it interesting that you bother to anwer him Judy.
